What Really Happens To Your Plastic “Recycling”

Updated: 3/18/2025 to reflect new data, research, and other developments on plastics recycling.

People often ask what really happens to their plastic recycling. Unfortunately, it doesn’t matter where you set out your plastic for recycling collection, whether at the end of your driveway, at your local recycling center, or in a municipal recycling bin: Most plastic items collected as recycling are not actually recycled. Surprisingly, plastic is not designed to be recycled.

When you put used plastic (bottles, films, foams, wraps, etc.) in a recycling bin (or trash bin), it is transferred into the hands of the global waste industry. This industry is made up of a wide network of businesses, governments, and individuals vying for a share of the nearly $1,300 billion that is generated annually in the global waste market. This trash trade has grown significantly over time, apace with plastics production and per capita waste generation, though actual recycling of plastic and other wastes makes up a very small share of the market.

From a recycling bin, plastics are sent by rail or truck to waste-sorting facilities, also called materials recovery facilities (MRFs). Here, plastics are often sorted by like types (think, bags and films, bottles, foams) and baled (squashed together into easily transportable space-saving cubes). Then, used plastic is loaded back up on a train or truck, or a cargo ship, for the next leg of its journey.

Jump to section:

Transportation | Waste Trade | Landfills/Dumps | Incineration/Waste-to-Energy | Recycling/Downcycling | Chemical/Advanced Recycling | Bacteria/Enzyme Recycling | Greenwashing

1. Plastic “Recycling” Pollutes When Transported

The transportation of plastic—no matter how it is carried—contributes to plastic pollution, as plastics easily blow, roll, bounce, or are picked up by animals like seagulls while they are on the move. This escaped plastic waste enters the environment and begins to break apart into plastic particles that enter our bodies when we eat, drink, and breathe. We’re exposed to even more pollution from the machines, vehicles, and fuels needed to power this constant transportation of plastic waste, which spew out hazardous particulate air pollution and climate-warming greenhouse gases.

2. Plastic “Recycling” Gets Shipped Away—But There is No “Away”

An enormous amount of plastics, labeled as “recycling,” have been historically shipped from the Global North to the Global South. Shipped plastic waste is rarely ever recycled upon reaching its destination. Instead, this waste trade more commonly involves waste haulers illegally dumping and open-burning plastics, shouldering the people who live near these dumping sites with major health risks and a degraded environment. 

Waste pickers process about 60% of all plastic collected for recycling around the world. People who earn incomes by picking wastes make the least from cheap plastics, and because of constant exposure to plastics in their line of work face elevated risks of cancers, infectious diseases (which cling to plastics), respiratory problems, and other serious health issues. Despite living and working on the frontlines of the plastic pollution and waste crises, waste pickers have historically been left out of policy discussions and decisions around waste management.

3. Plastic “Recycling” Ends Up in Landfills

Other plastics collected as recycling are simply landfilled or open-dumped (often illegally). Landfills and dumps emit climate-warming methane gas, attract insects and scavenging disease-carrying animals like rats and gulls, and leach toxic chemicals into surrounding soils and waters. They bring constant and loud truck and rail traffic to neighborhoods, decrease property values, release noxious diesel and waste fumes, and carry high risk of fires generated by landfill gases and highly flammable plastic waste, among other serious health concerns.

4. Plastic “Recycling” Gets Burned

A growing amount of plastics are sent to incinerators, sometimes called “waste-to-energy” plants. These facilities burn plastics in huge boilers, furnaces, kilns, or ovens to release toxic chemicals that cause serious health problems and greenhouse gases that drive climate change, while producing only meager amounts of electricity—if electricity is captured at all. 

Incineration also produces a constant stream of toxic ash that is hazardously landfilled or is used as aggregate in building materials like cement. Incinerator ash and emissions release toxic particulate matter and chemicals that increase people’s risk of cancers, respiratory illnesses, immune system problems, and other serious diseases. In the US, about 4.4 million people live within 3 miles of an incinerator, and 80 percent of those incinerators are located in low-income, rural, Black, Indigenous, and People of Color communities. Ash landfills, incinerators, and other polluting industrial sites are also concentrated in these overburdened communities.

5. Plastics “Recycling” Means “Downcycling”

Even when some form of plastics recycling actually does happen, the term “recycling” is a misnomer. You may have noticed that many plastic items are imprinted with small numbers surrounded by three interlocking arrows. While many people associate those arrows and numbers with recycling, in reality they confer nothing about a plastic item’s actual potential to be recycled. Instead, the numbers are considered codes indicating what type of plastic an item is made from. These numbers in the chasing arrows give the public a false sense that all plastics are recyclable or may be recycled.

When collected, plastics marked with numbers 1 and 2 are more likely to be recycled—or rather, downcycled—which means making lower-quality plastic products from the “recycled” plastic. For example, number 1 plastic, polyethylene terephthalate, or PET, is a clear plastic used for many beverage bottles and might get downcycled into things like fleece jackets and carpeting. Number 2 plastic is high-density polyethylene, or HDPE, which is an opaque plastic used to make more rigid plastic containers like milk jugs. HDPE is downcycled into things like plastic lumber and picnic tables, and eventually road filler. Sometimes plastic number 5, polypropylene, or PP, which is used for many medium-weight opaque plastic containers like yogurt pots and shampoo bottles is recycled (downcycled) into things like plastic crates and playground equipment—but like most plastics, it is more often landfilled. These downcycled items are end products and are not recycled again.

Even when plastic is recycled, which is rare, manufacturers mix in a large portion of newly made plastic or toxic additives to shredded, melted down plastic waste to restore some of its desirable properties. Plastics are not made to be recycled, and their quality diminishes, while becoming more toxic with each attempt. Recycling is also expensive, particularly collecting, sorting, and reprocessing plastic items; and it requires huge amounts of infrastructure, equipment, water, and energy. Meanwhile, the value of truly recycled plastics—that is, plastic turned back into plastic—has always been low. Incentives like government subsidies to the oil and gas industry make the production of newly made plastics far more profitable than recycling.

6. “Chemical or Advanced Recycling” of Plastics Really Means Melting or Burning

The plastic industry and the petrochemical industry which provides plastics’ fossil fuel ingredients continue to attempt to control the narrative around plastics and recycling. In addition to pushing plastics recycling as they always have, these industries are now also marketing so-called advanced, or chemical, recycling (a technical-sounding name that mostly means burning of plastics). 

Advanced recycling involves melting down or applying toxic chemical solvents to plastics to turn it into more basic petrochemical products—including energy or jet fuels that release climate-warming greenhouse gases. Advanced recycling processes produce hazardous waste that is transported and disposed of primarily in low-income communities and communities of color.

Only a tiny portion of these highly toxic fossil fuel compounds could potentially be used to make plastic. Further, chemical recycling does not stop plastic production at the source as we need it to, and instead, creates new dangers. This is not recycling.

Adding Bacteria & Enzymes to Plastic Is Not Recycling

The plastic and petrochemical industries are now also leaning heavily on the idea that bacteria and their enzymes may be able to break down plastics (which is incorrect, as they only accelerate the break up of plastics into hazardous particles and plastic’s fossil fuel ingredients), and therefore that there’s huge value in all the plastic waste piled up in landfills, communities, and the environment (there isn’t).

Scientists have found certain types of bacteria in landfills, such as Ideonella sakaiensis and Bacillus thuringiensis, that appear to turn plastic back into some of its petrochemical ingredients by digesting solid plastic with enzymes they produce. And some researchers have engineered common strains of bacteria, like E. coli, to produce plastic-digesting enzymes capable of reducing plastic into its chemical compounds so that they can be used again commercially.

While news around these bacteria and their enzymes has created a lot of buzz, there is only one U.S. startup, and one small-scale commercial plastics recycler in France that use enzymes to process around 500 pounds of PET plastic per day to be recycled back into plastic. For perspective, more than 2 billion pounds of plastic are discarded globally every day. In order for the enzymes to be commercially applied, collected plastic must be sorted, cleaned, shredded, and processed—industrial activities that are economically, energetically, and environmentally costly, and endanger human health.

Conclusion: Plastic “Recycling” is Greenwashing

In a world where many of us have been told by parents and teachers to recycle plastic as children, or learned from public service announcements, ads, and other kinds of media as young adults, this may come as a surprise or even a shock. How can an activity we’ve been told is right, actually be wrong?

Many activities, organizations, and products bear a green sheen without any substance behind it, or oversell their positive environmental impacts—this is “greenwashing.” It’s a prime business strategy for corporations making and selling plastic. Greenwashing can look like a vague label with words like “green,” “eco-friendly,” “bio-based,” “ocean-bound plastic,” or “certified plastic neutral” label slapped onto plastic items or packaging, or can be representative of an entire process—like plastic recycling itself. For example, chemists have claimed that some chemical recycling catalysts are nontoxic and do not require solvents to turn plastics into their fossil fuel ingredients; yet, these very ingredients are toxic. 

The plastic and petrochemical industries are also coopting language used to describe real solutions—like “zero-waste” and “circular”—inaccurately, for their benefit, mainly to perpetuate the myth of plastics recycling. Requiring significant inputs of chemicals, fossil fuels, energy, and water while polluting microplastics and hazardous wastes, the various processes for recycling plastic cannot be considered circular.

Behind the scenes as they extol the virtues of recycling, plastic and petrochemical industry trade groups pour money and energy into lobbying for legislation designed to erode protections on human and environmental health. Their end goal is to facilitate increased production of plastics, and they are achieving this by perpetuating misinformation and driving widespread pollution for their financial gain.

Throughout history, the interconnected fossil fuel and plastics industries have spent fortunes launching nonprofits with names that sound environmentally conscious and a heavy stream of media, instructional materials, and ad campaigns extolling the virtues of their recycling strategies, then and now. When one considers the facts, plastics “recycling” stops looking like recycling at all.

The Real Solution to is to Turn Off the Plastic Tap

Image courtesy of artist Ben Von Wong.

Less than 10 percent of plastics made since they were first mass-produced in the mid-1900s have been recycled. The recycling rate in the US, the world’s biggest plastic waste producer, is presently a mere five to six percent. But even if plastic recycling rates were higher, recycling alone could never come close to solving the serious and wide-ranging health, justice, socio-economic, and environmental crises caused by industries’ continued plastic production and plastic pollution, which go hand in hand. Production of plastic has only grown over time and has presently hit a rate of more than 400 million metric tons, more than double the rate at which plastics were made just 20 years ago. This is clearly a much more rapid pace than at which plastic recycling actually occurs.

It’s clear recycling is not enough to solve industries’ plastic pollution: Governments need to hold them accountable for their pollution and to turn off the plastic tap. 

464

39 responses to “What Really Happens To Your Plastic “Recycling””

  1. Lorena Magee says:

    So what should we do with the plastics we get? If “recycling” is bad then, what?

  2. Erica Cirino says:

    Thanks for your comment. As mentioned in our blog, “it’s clear recycling is not enough to solve the plastic pollution crisis. The fossil fuel industry, governments, and corporations really need to turn off the plastic tap.” While supporting systemic solutions to end plastic pollution, avoid buying items in plastic altogether by engaging in plastic-free principles. Learn more here: https://www.plasticpollutioncoalition.org/learn/plastic-pollution-solutions 

  3. Diane says:

    I found this article highly informative, I didn’t know just how much I didn’t know about this recycling biz.

  4. Deborah Blanchet says:

    The oil industry is a powerful conglomerate with no desire to lose the billions of dollars it gets from places like our taxes, or even increasing the price of gas because they’re not getting as much as they used to. Once consumers demand the packaging of items without the use of plastic start to realize that things like detergent bottles are a scam, maybe we can slowly we can stop this poisonous activity.

  5. Miriam Sachs says:

    Reading all of this for the first time makes me nauseous! What can individuals d

  6. Erica Cirino says:

    Thanks for caring! Learn more about solutions here: https://www.plasticpollutioncoalition.org/learn/plastic-pollution-solutions

  7. Dara says:

    I think this is terrible too but how can I avoid buying plastic items? Almost every item I buy each week in the grocery store only comes in plastic, so what other alternatives are there?

  8. Erica Cirino says:

    Hi Dara and thanks for your comment. Finding plastic-free groceries is made easier when you visit reuse/refill/zero-waste shops. Our friends at Plastic Free Future have a great map showing options near you: https://plastic-free-future.org/map
    Litterless also has a good directory of shops in the US: https://www.litterless.com/wheretoshop
    We also recommend searching for your local farmer’s market to find unwrapped fresh foods, or growing your own food from seeds if you have windowboxes or room for a garden.

  9. Matt says:

    Thanksnfor this informative article. Where can I find more proof (studies, investigative reporting, etc) to back this up and show to others?

  10. Joyce T says:

    Why can’t laundry and other plastics be returned to the companies to clean and refill them putting on new caps?

  11. Catherine Dodd RN PhD says:

    Plastic Grass (aka artificial turf) is being sold as a drought solution that allows kids to play soccer all year round. There are many health issues related: chemicals including PFAS, creation of heat islands, micro plastic production, lack of shock resiliency, short life (10years) – goes to “landfill” although some are claiming it can be recycled using electro magnetic frequencies. Can you comment on whether it can be recycled. I realize it just becomes another plastic but policy makers are claiming it doesn’t just go to landfill.

  12. Gina Ferraro says:

    Very interesting article but very disappointing to know all the recycling we do is not doing any real good for the environment. So do we just stop separating our own trash & toss it all out together?

  13. SEB says:

    Pretty harsh reality check.

  14. Thomas Tiahrt says:

    I see that plastic #1 (PET) and plastic #2 (HDPE) are more recyclable. What happens to those two categories of plastic? Are they recycled here? Or do they get shipped overseas?

  15. Erica Cirino says:

    Thanks for your message. Please take a look at the resources in our Library, here: https://www.plasticpollutioncoalition.org/learn/resource-library

  16. Erica Cirino says:

    While companies can and should engage in reuse/refill practices, many do not. This is especially true of companies that have used plastic in their products and packaging. With every use, plastics become more contaminated and less useful. It’s now less expensive to produce “new” plastic than collect, reuse, refill, and recycle plastics. But even when reused, refilled, or recycled, plastics are still dangerous. Plastics release chemicals, climate-warming emissions, and tiny microplastics into our bodies and environment. Systems of plastic-free reuse and refill, using more easily reusable and less toxic materials such as glass, wood, ceramic, and stainless steel can go a long way in safeguarding human and Earth health. These are the solutions we need.

  17. Erica Cirino says:

    Hi there. Despite some business claims, plastic grass is not recyclable. It is made of many types of plastics, and many different layers, making it incredibly complex to separate plastic grass from its backing, sand/gravel, and rubber infill. What’s more, plastic grass is highly hazardous to human and environmental health. Learn more: https://www.plasticpollutioncoalition.org/blog/2022/6/3/pass-on-plastic-grass

  18. Erica Cirino says:

    In many places, plastics #1 and #2 are more recyclable than other plastics due to heightened demand for these types of recycled plastics. According to research, plastics #1 and #2 achieve reprocessing rates of around 10-20%, compared to other plastics that have reprocessing rates of less than 5%. But reprocessing doesn’t necessarily mean recycling, and in fact, many plastics have been and continue to be shipped overseas from the Global North to the Global South only to be dumped or open-burned…not recycled.

  19. Gabe Crain says:

    Can you speak a little bit about forms of recycling that do work? Such as paper, glass, aluminum and tin? Are these materials more recyclable, and actually being reused?

  20. Erica Cirino says:

    Hi there. Yes, happy to weigh in. Glass and metal can for the most part be recycled indefinitely. Paper can be recycled five to seven times before its quality lessens. This is a far better track record than plastics, which are rarely recycled and if they are recycled, lose quality. However, every recycling process has costs——including water and energy use, and various forms of land-use and pollution. And recycling rates of these other materials could be far greater, and the processes less toxic. So it’s not free of costs to people and the planet. However, if a material can’t be reused indefinitely, recycling is a way to extend its use. However, most effective is to prevent wastefulness by first engaging with reuse, refill, repair, and share——which greatly reduces the need to recycle and potentially create waste.

  21. Erica Cirino says:

    We hope you feel empowered by knowing the truth about recycling. What it tells us is we should stay focused on avoiding single-use plastic (and other single-use materials) by engaging in plastic-free reuse, refill, repair, and share. Recycling metals, glass, and paper is more effective than recycling plastics and these materials tend to stay longer in circulation and use‚ and so it is worth continuing to separate and recycle them if you find yourself with waste.

  22. Anina says:

    I know that the best solution is to avoid single-use plastics altogether, but in today’s society, that clearly isn’t possible unless you are a farmer, and quite possibly, not even then. So if recycling doesn’t actually work for plastic, then what should we do? Also, are there places that aren’t part of the recycling system that will actually recycle plastic?

  23. Matt says:

    If I find myself in the possession of some waste plastic that can’t be reused, how do you advocate handling it? Throw it away? Burn it? Recycle it?

  24. Excess Poly Inc says:

    I read your blog on plastic recycling, and it’s incredibly eye-opening! Your detailed explanation of the recycling process sheds light on the harsh reality behind plastic recycling and how much of it ends up being incinerated or sent to landfills. We must recognize the limitations of recycling and focus more on reducing plastic consumption and finding sustainable alternatives. Keep spreading awareness about the importance of reducing plastic pollution!

  25. Race Eco Chain says:

    This blog brilliantly demystifies the journey of plastic recycling, offering a transparent look into its real impact. It’s an eye-opener that encourages us to rethink our consumption patterns and recycling habits. A must-read for eco-conscious individuals!

  26. Erica Cirino says:

    As mentioned in this blog post, some plastics are more likely to be recycled than others, though it’s no guarantee. So, if you do have plastic you want to do something about, if it’s #1, 2, or 5, you can try to recycle it. If not, you might as well trash it. But, this lack of good choices emphasizes why it’s so important to stop plastic pollution before it starts, by focusing on prevention and choosing reuse and refill and package-free or homemade products, foods, and beverages whenever possible.

  27. Erica Cirino says:

    As mentioned in the blog, there are some plastics (#1,2,5) that are more often recycled than others, but even that is no guarantee. Reuse and refill shops using plastic-free, unpackaged, and bulk items allow people to buy foods and supplies that they can bring home in their own reusable containers, massively cutting down on single-use plastics. You can find such shops here and here.

  28. Kevin says:

    Back in the 80’s I worked a summer job at a Coke Cola bottling plant.
    We threw cases of dirty glass bottles on a line that ran through a machine and cleaned them with a caustic solution. The bottles were then refilled and back out to the store.
    That plant no longer exists.

  29. Christine champoux says:

    Very interesting what happens to plastics

  30. MoneyMevans says:

    Keep up the good work guys

  31. places to drop off recycling says:

    This is a helpful post! Knowing places to drop off recycling is so important, especially with the growing need for eco-friendly waste management. Local drop-off spots for recycling help keep our communities clean and reduce landfill waste. It would be great if more people were aware of these resources, as many don’t realize how accessible recycling centers can be. Thank you for sharing this valuable info!

  32. Reid says:

    Why do we not go back to glass bottles for sodas. Large containers you can refill items from, using glass containers. It’s recyclable and glass can be used over and over again. If we cannot fix the recycling we need to replace it. Or is the greed from the oil company’s too great that they cannot give up a corner of the market that is destroying our planet. Recycling is a hoax. We need to change what we use for containers.

  33. Christopher Jones says:

    Another reason to turn off the “Plastic Tap” is sterility. The small number of plastics that have been tested often prove to be endocrine disruptors. We are all getting higher concentrations of plastics in our bodies all the time, and male sperm counts are 50% down since the advent of plastics. We may be setting the stage for global sterility, and not just for humans.

  34. Alicia says:

    Do you think it would be a good idea to implement plastic reduction and recycling in schools?

  35. Mike Hooper says:

    Plastics suicide? Are plastics the final cause of a terminal extinction event looming on the horizon for all mammalian life here on Earth? Is our collective short term convenience lifestyle usurping the long term survival of our human and interspecies future? Could there be a way to go Native and think in terms of Seven Generations as a policy for all our stuff? NIMBY politics, out of sight, out of mind etc., are keeping us locked in like lemmings walking in step to our immanent doom. So what do we do? We can know our place, where are we on the face of the earth and take care of it, our home range, with local farms, dairy’s, bulk foods. Its a gargantuan problem in urgent need of regional solutions. Reuse is the Real Work.

  36. Emma Mia says:

    Thanks for the detailed breakdown—really eye-opening. For those who can’t make it to city events, I’ve found local services like Office Source Shredding services helpful for secure document shredding.

  37. Misha Barwell says:

    This is cool

  38. Erica Cirino says:

    Schools are a great place to reduce plastic use. See our resources here: https://www.plasticpollutioncoalition.org/blog/2024/3/15/resources-creatingplastic-free-schools

  39. V.Q says:

    this is SO! Sad! I can’t believe that most of the plastic that I recycle dosn’t actually get recycled.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Donate

To Stop Plastic Pollution